Ensuring a participatory and inclusive process – consultations - Childrens Rights Reform

Ensuring a participatory and inclusive process – consultations

  • A crucial aspect of comprehensive legislative reform is engaging all stakeholders, including children, in a participatory process.
  • A primary means of achieving such inclusivity is through consultation.
  • Consultations should encompass a broad spectrum of individuals, institutions and groups concerned with legislation impacting children's rights.
  • In order to understand the impact of the existing legislation and the ways in which the legislation relates to the real situation of children, it is important to undertake a consultation that will involve as many segments of civil society as possible, including children.
    • The possible range of participants in the consultative phase of the reform process is extensive. The process should:
      • Engage as many different points of view as possible to ensure the widest possible perspective on the ways in which the legislation under consideration affects the lives of children.
      • Engage the people who work with the legislation on a day‐to‐day basis.
        • E.g.: teachers, health professionals, social workers, institutional and prison staff, the staff of government‐operated recreational and cultural institutions, administrators, and managers.
      • Involve judges and lawyers who will consider the legislation in court or in mediation.
      • Provide a full opportunity for representatives of all levels of government to present their opinions and experiences, since the specific provisions of the legislation may be implemented at lower levels (state/provincial, district and municipal).
      • Support traditional leaders to offer their own views and experiences, especially in countries in which customary law plays an important role.

Children

  • Legislative reform should be conducted in a participatory manner, paying particular attention to the views of children at all stages. Legislative reform processes must be inclusive and adapted to allow all children, including vulnerable and marginalised children, to take part in the process.
  • States Parties should presume that children have the capacity to form their own views and recognise their right to be heard (CRC GC 12, para. 20). All children, including children who may experience difficulties in expressing themselves and making their views heard, should be given the opportunity to be heard. States Parties are encouraged to consult with children from the earliest age in line with their evolving capacities, best interests and right to protection from harmful experiences (CRC GC 7, para. 14).
  • To ensure children’s effective and meaningful participation in the children’s rights legislative reform process, States Parties should:
Secure their investment in the process through laws and policies, and ensure the process is supported by sufficient investment.
  • Enact laws which guarantee the children's right to participate in all matters affecting them, including in legislative reform. This should also extend to their right to freedom of expression, including freedom to seek, receive and impart information (see article 13 CRC) on the children’s rights legislative reform process; and the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and to freedom of association to make their views heard on the need for reform and what it should include (see article 15 CRC);
  • Ensure that these laws and policies are specific and provide guidance on the format, structure, operation and evaluation of the child participation mechanisms used during the legislative reform;
  • Make sufficient resources available, including financial resources, to ensure sustainable and effective child participation mechanisms are introduced and maintained.
Strengthen children’s agency, capacity and knowledge to participate in legislative reform.
Create a political, social and cultural environment conducive to participation in the children’s rights legislative reform process
  • Facilitate direct contact between children and decision-makers who will be developing and adopting legislation;
  • Provide adequate training and support to adults (e.g. members of the executive and the legislative) engaging with children;
  • Promote the benefits of child participation with the adults working on the children’s rights legislative reform, as well as with the wider community, leading to general widespread acceptance of the practice;
  • Mainstream children’s voices in legislative reform processes.
Build quality spaces and processes for child participation in legislative reform.
  • Create dedicated physical and online spaces for children to participate in legislative reform.
  • Establish and implement child safeguarding procedures throughout the process, in order to prevent and address any harm to children as a result of their participation (see Lansdown 2011).
  • Ensure that the process is fully transparent and clearly explained to all involved. The explanation to children of the way they will be involved in the legislative process and the manner in which their voice will be taken into account should be done in a format and language they understand.
Build inclusive structures, involving vulnerable and marginalised children.
  • Include diverse groups of children, especially children from deprived and marginalised groups, in child participation processes.
  • Where necessary, introduce measures to accommodate children’s particular circumstances with a view to reducing discrimination and exclusion.
  • E.g.: In Ireland, the national parliament for young people (Dáil na nÓg), parliament includes children with disabilities, children in state care, refugee children and those from disadvantaged areas. This is done by ensuring that children are selected from organisations that represent these groups. Within the parliament, children can also be provided with non-verbal methods of communication. This gives children to ways to illustrate their views based on their age, maturity and understanding (Parkes 2013).
Ensure accountability, feedback and follow-up.
  • Set up mechanisms for feedback, evaluation and monitoring of the child participation mechanisms used during the children’s rights legislative reform.
  • Ensure that the evaluation is undertaken by independent monitoring bodies.
  • Provide feedback directly to children who have participated in one of the feedback mechanisms, in a timely manner and in a format that is easily accessible and understandable to them.
Source: Adapted from: Forde et al. (2020)

When carrying out consultations with children, States could use the Lundy model of child participation:

Lundy model Lundy model

All stakeholders (other than children)

  • Adopting a participatory and open process, involving all stakeholders, is essential to ensure that legislation connects adequately to children’s rights and challenges concerning children’s rights implementation. Broad consultations are central to the process of legislative reform.
  • In addition to children, States Parties should engage with a wide range of actors in the children’s rights legislative reform process, in particular:
    • Organisations representing or working with or for children acting on behalf of or for the government or in a private (not for profit) capacity (e.g. educational institutions, (mental) health institutions, social services, child care and protection boards, care institutions) and professionals working with or for children (e.g. social workers, teachers/schools, medical professionals, community workers)
    • Judiciary, lawyers, public prosecutors, other legal professions, and police/law enforcement
    • ICRIs and NHRIs
    • Civil society/NGOs
    • Religious and community leaders
    • Business sector
    • Media
    • Academic institutions
    • International organisations, including UNICEF
    • The broader community

Public consultations
  • Consultations should be public, except in circumstances which require restrictions in conformity with the law, or where private discussions would be in the best interests of children or vulnerable populations.
  • To ensure that the consultation process is meaningful and accessible to the public, the consultation documents should be made available and accessible to all. States Parties can take proactive steps to:
    • Make the consultation documents available in print and online;
    • Make the consultation documents available in all languages spoken in the country, as well as in accessible formats;
    • Promote the consultation through traditional and social media;
    • Ensure that stakeholders working in and/or interested in children’s rights receive the consultation document (outreach);
    • Provide feedback to participants afterwards on how and to what extent their input has been taken into account.

There are several ways in which States Parties can engage in public consultations during the children’s rights legislative reform process:

Undertake active consultations
  • Establish consultation platforms and groups where substantive issues related to legislative reform can be discussed.
  • Organise public meetings and events (e.g. town hall meetings), in which information is shared and views collected.
  • Organise observational consultations and site visits to facilitate understanding of particular issues affecting children.
  • It will be important to ensure appropriate documentation and record keeping of the consultations.
Solicit written inputs
  • Written inputs can be received through completion of online questionnaires or submission of reports, letters or memos.
  • It should be made clear whether the written inputs will be made public or not.

E.g.: The South African Law Reform Commission indicates in all its research papers published for public comment that, unless comments or representations are marked ‘confidential’, the Commission will assume that respondents grant the Commission permission to quote from their comments and to refer to respondents by name. In addition, the Commission may, under the terms of the Promotion of Access to Information Act 2 of 2000, be required to release information contained in representations or comments submitted to the Commission.

E.g. In the Netherlands, all legislative proposals (as well as governmental decrees and ministerial regulations) are published on a special website (https://www.internetconsultatie.nl) and shared with key stakeholders for consultation. The input provided will be published on the website, unless participants object to that. Participants can indicate if they want to stay informed about the legislative process.

Source: Commonwealth Secretariat (2017)

Examples of children’s rights legislative reform processes that involved a wide variety of stakeholders:

E.g.: In September 2022, a referendum was held in Cuba to approve the Family Code 2022. According to End Violence Against Children, the new legislation, is widely celebrated as one of the ‘most progressive codes of families’. The legislation provides strengthened measures for the protection of children and adolescents across the country. The creation of the new Family Code included a large number of citizens in its development and approval. It took shape through a participatory process that involved 75% of the Cuban electorate. Over 25 drafts of the law were produced following nearly 80,000 neighbourhood meetings and over 400,000 public proposals. When introduced, the new Code received overwhelming support, with over 66% of voters approving its implementation (End Violence Against Children, 2022).

The Georgian Code on the Rights of the Child adopted in 2019 was the result of a partnership between the Parliament Committee on Human Rights and Civil Integration and UNICEF, with political and financial support from the European Union. It involved participatory engagement with relevant stakeholders, including civil society organisations, academia, religious and community leaders, child rights experts and children from different ethnic, religious, socioeconomic and other backgrounds. Equal participation of girls and boys and children with disabilities was ensured.

The Zambian Children’s Code Act 2022 involved broad participation by stakeholders comprising the relevant government institutions, NGO, community-based organisations and faith-based organisations. The process was co-hosted by the Ministry of Community Development and Social Services and the Zambia Law Development Commission. The National Human Rights Commission – Office of the Commissioner for Children participated and helped guide the process. UNICEF also supported the participation of social welfare and justice practitioners in reviewing drafts of the Children’s Code and providing input. UNICEF also brought expertise on a range of international standards and provided advice on aligning the content of the Children’s Code with these standards. All relevant stakeholders, including a range of NGOs, were invited to the Ministry of Justice Internal Judicial Review, in which the Ministry scrutinised each segment of the law and accepted inputs and recommendations. The Ministry of Justice also facilitated and incorporated inputs from different ministries and bodies, such as the submission from the Gender Division on protection of child victims and witnesses.

In Kenya, the constitutional reform began in the 1990s with the struggle to change the political system from one party to a multi‐party democracy. As part of constitutional review initiative in Kenya, the Constitution of Kenya Review Commission spearheaded a nationwide consultative process to obtain constitutional proposals on a wide range of human rights and policy issues. This movement gathered great momentum in the 1990s, bringing together individuals and organisations from many sectors of society and many parts of the country. At the forefront of the movement were religious, gender and human rights organisations and the Constitutional Commission charged with spearheading the process facilitated a broad participatory process. It encouraged numerous civil society organisations to provide civic education and supported other groups to assist in these efforts by offering financial and other resources. The Commission prepared a national curriculum and teaching materials for civic education, including a resource called Reviewing the Constitution, all of which were widely distributed. It also distributed a booklet, entitled The Constitutional Review Process in Kenya: Issues and Questions for Public Hearing, to stimulate reflections on reform and to elicit recommendations. The process made it possible for the Commission to gather information to craft specific provisions on children’s rights. Source: UNICEF 2008